Most people associate widescreen with those "awful black bars on the
top and bottom of the picture" which apparently cut down on how much
they can see.
In a way they are correct, it is not technically possible to cram more detail
into a smaller space without a loss of resolution.
However, if you are prepared to make the trade-off (I am, and my TV is only
12 inches diagonal!) then you will actually be watching MORE.
The way this works... Most movies that are made for a cinema release will be
filmed in widescreen because that is the traditional way a movie is projected.
If the director is any good, then he will make best use of his media - which
means creating imposing shots that fill the movie screen. If you then chop
bits off to make it look 'proper' on a TV screen, you will lose a lot of the
impact.
Both of these images were recorded with my video digitiser, from the movie "Evita". You are looking at the same scene.
Do you recognise it?
Look to the right of the widescreen version.
In the widescreen version, the camera does a slow tilt up the stairway above
the hall. The "Pan & Scan" version does a fairly rapid
pan across from the coffin to the stairs, then up the stairs.
Did the director intend the shot to be rapid? Or was it supposed to be slow and deliberate to catch the mourning.
This simple shot illustrates why it is preferable to watch movies in their
original format - widescreen. You get to watch exactly what was intended,
not what some techie decides looks good.
But this butchery is accepted and continues to be practised because people would moan up a stink if they thought they were being done out of half of their picture. They don't realise the reality that they are being done out of as much as two thirds of the picture!
Congratulations to Channel 4 and the European 16:9 Action Plan for presenting
some movies in their correct ratio. I hope SKY television will soon be brave
enough to show some of its premiering movies in widescreen. Since this page was
originally written, BBC 2 has shown movies in widescreen too.
Another update, Sky Premier on digital has a widescreen channel. Only one, mind
you, but it is a start...
In order to try to please both groups, and to allow for future widescreen
presentations, some television productions (such as "An unsuitable job
for a woman") are recorded in the widescreen 16:9 ratio but with the
main action framed to take place in the centre of the shot. This is then
broadcast in a semi-widescreen 14:9 ratio with the sides of the image chopped
off, and tiny black bars above and below. Little or no pan & scan is used.
Since this text was originally written, the majority of BBC's live output is
now broadcast to analogue equipment (ie, a normal telly) in 14:9.
To give you something to think about, take a look at these impressive images from Baz Luhrmann's "Romeo + Juliet".
"Romeo + Juliet" is presented here at a ratio of 2.37:1; which is 21.3:9 - even wider than conventional widescreen!
Both of these are taken from the UK video release, widescreen version.
Please try to imagine how the images would look on a television when shown at 4:3 ratio. How could you maintain the impact and power of these shots, when you will be losing a LOT of the image.
How would it look?
Copyright © 1999 Richard Murray