- entry 2009/09/20

Faster, better, downloads

This is where "Free Download Manager" comes in. It integrates into the browser so it can manage downloads instead. While Firefox is capable of resuming a download, FDM seems to be better in making sure that the entire thing arrived, and patiently waiting for all the bits.
Now here's the winning thing. Firefox downloads from beginning to end, right? Well, it can average on one connection to make around about 64kbit. It varies wildly depending on time of day, server, etc. So I'm saying 64kbit is about what it feels like it averages.
FDM, on the other hand, splits the file into chunks and starts a separate download for each chunk. This might sound wasteful, but it actually turns out to be a lot more effective for the end user. Large downloads come in so much faster, as the bitrate approaches 130kbit, which is about the fastest my connection will run. If you set it to "heavy" (aggressive) mode, with the option to step back a level on detecting browser activity, it will be the best trade off between download speed and user 'confort'.

Anyway, a very useful tool to have for those purposes alone, and that's only some of the stuff Free Download Manager is capable of doing.

My second best vide grenier...

So today we went to a little local vide grenier in support of a nursing home. Quite a big complex, it was a place I was almost employed until it became evident that I was "from across the border". That border where the skies are grey, the tap water is full of nitrates, and dragons roam freely...

Anyway, I saw a bloke advertising DVDs for €0.50. At first I ignored it, thinking it would be the usual not-quite-knock-off DVDs you can get in the supermarkets for a couple of euros - the ones with the audio only in French, mostly weird B-movies (I've seen a fair bit of Zone Horror's playlist pass by), too frequently only in 4:3 aspect (though it tries to hide this by calling it "1.33").
But then something caught my eye. A box. Several in fact. For cheap DVDs simply don't come in boxes.

I dropped a tenner in a heartbeat.

You might find some of my choices 'odd', but remember - it's 50 cents apiece. I will pay 50¢ for a triple-disc set of Robocop!
I got "Contre-Jour" as it looks like a film mom might enjoy. Mom wanted "Adam's Apples" as the cover looked like a film she might enjoy - though the back says it's about a neonazi and a sheep-healing pastor, so go figure!

Greed knows no bounds

In a move to try to reduce risky behaviour by the banking system, our own Sarkozy is intending to talk G20 leaders into supporting the "Tobin Tax", which according to BBC News would be a levy "applied to every financial transaction".
As it turns out, this is actually more correctly a tax on cross-currency transactions, but one that could well affect us, plus every other ex-pat and anybody holidaying overseas. Will it be a lot? You can bet the personal withdrawal taxes will be disproportianate to what the banks themselves would pay.

I think, as it is transpiring that WE are indeed going to be expected to pick up the tab for this financial madness, I think it is high time that we the wallet-holding voters, get a say in matters. No more agressive policies gradually watered down to inneffective indecision.
Here, instead, is how it should be:

• No pay bonuses. Period. The end.
  Even after all the $#!+ that's gone down, some banks still seem happy to take taxpayer cash and hand wodges of it to people who have "done well". Sorry, if you do your job well you get considered for promotion. If you suck at your job, you get replaced. That's how it is for millions of employees. That's how it should be for the banking sector.
• If a bank is failing, director payoffs and pay packages are automatically annulled pending re-evaluation.
• If a bank fails, its director and all of the senior administration lose their jobs. If the same people ran a normal company into the ground, the effects would be the same. Any taxpayer cash should come with the proviso that management is replaced. No if/but/maybe. Bail out = thrown out.
• There are three choices - bail the bank (at which point it moves into PUBLIC ownership), sell the bank to private investors (where it is bailed, but NOT with taxpayer cash), or fail the bank (it goes down).
  The decision of what to do should be taken firstly on the grounds of "what effect to the country/economy if we let it fail", and secondly "what effect the those with accounts there"? Every effort should be made not to safeguard the cash of creditors and companies owned money, but rather those whose accounts are now in limbo. Any transaction taken (bail or sell) should contain a requirement to safeguard the money in accounts held at that bank.

I think these people would all agree with me. Time if the goverments and the banks fail to implement radical reform, the people who eventually carry the can start to kick up a stink.

It's no longer to be about making them money, it's about safeguarding ours.

[see also http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8256010.stm, and check the links on the right too]

Your comments:

Please note that while I check this page every so often, I am not able to control what users write; therefore I disclaim all liability for unpleasant and/or infringing and/or defamatory material. Undesired content will be removed as soon as it is noticed. By leaving a comment, you agree not to post material that is illegal or in bad taste, and you should be aware that the time and your IP address are both recorded, should it be necessary to find out who you are. Oh, and don't bother trying to inline HTML. I'm not that stupid! ☺ ADDING COMMENTS DOES NOT WORK IF READING TRANSLATED VERSIONS.
 
You can now follow comment additions with the comment RSS feed. This is distinct from the b.log RSS feed, so you can subscribe to one or both as you wish.

No comments yet...

Add a comment (v0.11) [help?] . . . try the comment feed!
		Your name
		Your email	(optional)
		Validation	Are you real? Please type 65837 backwards.
		Your comment