Dude, where's my car^Hcoat?
So I finish my final day of the week, an early, and I go into the locker room to find my coat missing. You could come up with all sorts of theories, but to be honest I think the basic bottom line is that some dumb-ass took it as a thermal jacket to wear in the cold room. Well, okay, it was navy blue and their jackets are navy blue. That's about where the similarities end...
I told my immediate superior who said I should report it to the administrative people on Monday. No idea why she didn't do it then, so Monday I will mention it if it is not back on the hanger.
If it doesn't turn up, I fully plan to push to be recompensated for it, plus to have a locker of my own. I can imagine them saying "you left it in the cloakroom, it's your problem" which is a bit of a bogus excuse when they don't have any sort of secure place for me to dump stuff ("all of the lockers are taken, tant pis"). I'll let you know what happens.
Incidentally, so much for their idea of 'sterility' wearing a white outfit, face masks, and hair-net things. I wonder how much cat fur fell off of my coat if it was, indeed, in the cold storage room? Oh well, it isn't my problem.
At work there's a nifty cutting machine that uses a tiny stream of extremely high pressure water to cut cakes. I always saw it cutting rectangles, but today it was cutting circles. Nifty. Anyway, as I was tidying up, the LCD on the machine said "CNC Link Error" and something about PLC. If I remember from my boarding school nights, when I used to lie on my bed reading the RS catalogue (for fun), anyway, I recall a PLC is a "Process Logic Controller". I saw a picture in a catalogue when I was about fourteen and I'd have to wait twenty years to see one inside something.
I have an RS catalogue here. It's the size of a decent phone book. As I probably pored through it in detail more than the entire staff added together, my Physics teacher said I could take it home at the end of term. It is dated July-October 1988. Yup, that's the one. PLCs are in section 23 starting on page 478. Days when you could get a 6502 processor (3MHz CMOS) for £5.24. Don't ask how much a V.23 (!) modem will set you back. It's scary.
So I gave my details to the French branch of RS. I wonder if I will receive their catalogue in any form? I also requested a Farnell catalogue from their French offshoot. A polite lady emailed me right back to say that I missed out my SIRET number and phone number (a SIRET is a registration number that tradesmen must have, or something like that). She added a PS that the catalogue was reserved for 'enterprises' (companies/businesses). So I emailed her in return to ask if there was a CD-ROM version or something available for a private individual or if it would be possible for me to 'order' their catalogue. No reply...
So my request is this: Do you work for a company that uses RS or Farnell catalogues (or similar)? If so, do you have any old ones (like earlier in the year, 2007,...) that you could send me? If so, please email me for my address!
That word, said something like gah-spee-yah-j is the French word for "wastage". Mom said to me that she wanted to buy a 'eco-friendly' coffee maker, namely one that takes those tea-bag things and not plastic/foil sachets. Weeks ago, I would have agreed. However knowing now that the place where I work throws out more plastic wastage in an hour than I could accumulate in coffee containers in my entire lifetime, it does rather put a different slant on things.
Here's another. My shift ran from 5am to 12h30pm (the 'old' hours). During that time I was primarily the one sorting out the green bags. Certainly on the weight form it was all my writing except for two entries!
Anyway, because I'm crap at maths, in my head I rounded-to-nearest and kept a tally of the little lemon-on-shortbread things. I think they are "amuse-bouche", but really it's like the world's tiniest lemony custard flan, about 3cm across? Now bearing in mind an assortment of maybe 12 or 16 of these things will be shrinkwrapped, boxed, and sold for something in the order of €3 to €6, can you imagine what the losses were?
I'll tell you.
You'd better sit down.
Remember, rounding to nearest so it isn't a precise figure, the value I arrived at was 107kg. Yes, one hundred and seven kilograms. That's about 236 imperial pounds, for those who measure the old-fashioned way. That's heavier than me! That's actually quite a bit heavier than me! And that's in the course of one shift.
Now, I cannot tell you what 'percentage' that is of the overall creation, if 107kg of toss-outs for one product is a lot or not, but for me, given the food shortages and the global food price rises, that is an appalling figure.
I know I can never be a 'management' type, but I do wonder how much of this could be averted by having the staff work slower and more methodically. It's always such a rush, so much to do and so little time. The production line is like "add, squish, add, squish, add, squish...". Could it be that losses would be reduced if everybody took a little more care and time in their work?
Maybe I'm missing the big picture. Maybe nobody gives a crap about losses so long as targets are met. More time = fewer targets? Perhaps that's how we arrive at figures such as these?
Please note that while I check this page every so often, I am not able to control what users write; therefore I disclaim all liability for unpleasant and/or infringing and/or defamatory material. Undesired content will be removed as soon as it is noticed. By leaving a comment, you agree not to post material that is illegal or in bad taste, and you should be aware that the time and your IP address are both recorded, should it be necessary to find out who you are. Oh, and don't bother trying to inline HTML. I'm not that stupid! ☺ ADDING COMMENTS DOES NOT WORK IF READING TRANSLATED VERSIONS.
You can now follow comment additions with the comment RSS feed. This is distinct from the b.log RSS feed, so you can subscribe to one or both as you wish.
(Felicity? Marte? Find out!)
List all b.log entries
Return to the site index
PS: Don't try to be clever.
It's a simple substring match.
Last read at 18:46 on 2021/04/16.
© 2008 Rick Murray
This web page is licenced for your personal, private, non-commercial use only. No automated processing by advertising systems is permitted.
RIPA notice: No consent is given for interception of page transmission.